The latest IMA List of Minerals, July 2024, is published here. There are currently 6062 valid species.
Each update contains new minerals, refined chemical formulae, and other changes, all highlighted in yellow so easy to find. In addition, if there are any, species that get unapproved are marked in red.
One of this updateโs new mineral species is manganonewberyite, the manganese analogue of newberyite.
Newberyite is a phosphate mineral formed through interactions between bat guano, microbes, ground water, and basalt and clay aluminosilicates, and first described from the Skipton Caves, Victoria, Australia. Manganonewberyite is reported from the Cassagna Mine, Ne, Italy.
Letโs compare the formulae of the two species:
Newberyite: Mg(PO3OH)ยท3H2O
Manganonewberyite: Mn(PO3OH)(H2O)3
Analysis of newberyite from the Type Locality showed small amounts of manganese, and also iron. Is it possible that there could be an Fe analogue out there somewhere?
And what is it with this naming IMA? Why โmanganoโ? Why not newberyite-(Mn), with the original one redefined as newberyite-(Mg)? When are you going to be consistent? ๐ฃ
In case you have forgotten, think back to the axinite naming debacle!
Below: Newberyite, Skipton Lava Caves. Museum Victoria specimen. The label is about 75mm wide.
I've said this before, the IMO haven't got enough to do except make life miserable for collectors. As Steve said they can't even be consistent in the way they name things.
hahhaa maybe someone was having a little play with words - man-guano ?